Is it more than will-power?

Posted by & filed under Dr. Bernard-Carreño, Featured, Food Injustice, Food News, People's Opinion of BCP.

As we continue to think about ways in which folks can begin to think about changing their eating habits, there have been many suggestions. In our class specifically, many have suggested that if people who have low-no access to healthy food would just (1) resist junk food, (2) make the effort/trip to find better options, (3) change their attitude about the way they eat, and (4) just find better options they would be better off, and maybe so many other things like soup kitchens, food pantries, food banks, etc., could see a reduction? The reality holds so many more factors that although the summer session is ending, we didn’t even crack.

At a fairly well-stocked Pathmark in Queens, in its own column, was the product display of what you see in the picture above. This was at the end of an entire aisle of chips/dry snacks with what seemed like endless options. Again, everything in moderation is more my perspective than to deplete folks of their guilty pleasure and take on a super righteous attitude and then sneak snacks when no one is looking, but this column just raised my skin in several ways.

In the image, you can see that the soda that’s on sale, is identified as “mini-cans” with a sign below that reads “Open Happiness.” (Clever). These sodas are on sale for just $4.19 (for a 6 pack) (about $0.69 ea. can) and are labeled under the store’s “Everyday Value.” To the left of the soda is the “Little Debbie” snack display (not on sale and more expensive than some of the fresh vegetables and fruits combined).

What’s the point? The point is… Pathmark takes food stamps and is situated (this particular one) in what could easily be classified as a food desert (if it didn’t exist there), and while there are TONS of other choices folks could make, how much responsibility do you put on people who just don’t understand the damage that these products can do over time (especially since they go on sale and become an ‘everyday value’ and inside they contain ‘happiness?’ If you know what this mini soda tastes like, and what little debbie cakes taste like and the need they fulfill, then how enticing is it to walk over to the fresh fruit/veg aisle and pick up the unknown? How do you get the urge to say “eh, no little debbies, no soda, I’ll get some plums for $1.99/lb?” I’ll make fresh guacamole instead of buying it in a pouch that’s labeled “wellness?”

To make my skin crawl even more, today is National Fried Chicken day. Have we nothing else to celebrate?

4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Lily Ji
Lily Ji

The supermarkets display these items because they are the ones people do not turn to first. These items represent impulse purchases. A supermarket will never display fruits, vegetables, pasta, etc. because these are staple foods. Deserts and sodas are not necessary and are impluse purchases. The supermarket views these products as an area in which they stand to make more money. Of course the supermarket has some influence over what the people buy. These items are promoted because of 1)popularity and 2)extra profit that comes in. Even those in poverty undderstand cake is not healthy, and most do not go to the supermarket just to buy cake. The market has a right to promote whatever they want, as they are a private business. It is up to the consumer to take personal responsiblity and make the right choice. I think it is less they are uninformed, rather their standards are lower. For instance, "I could eat this macaroni and cheese because it doesn't have any trans-fats." It may be promoted as not containing trans-fat, and this is good, but that does not make it a healthy choice. Sadly, eating unhealthy food is one of the few pleasures in life for those in poverty. The markets will promote it this way, but people have to resist.

Yeudy Vasquez
Yeudy Vasquez

You cant really blame it on these super market, because at the end of the day its a business. They could careless what you consume as long it sells its none of their concern. We americans just have to be smarter and just think in the long run about our health. We just tend to care about what taste good, or what you've been brought up eating. Its our health not the super market, we should worry about it ourselves and not point the finger as to why we eat the way we do.

Nassim
Nassim

Hello, Everything in moderation is my theme and should be a theme to the underclass although they cannot afford to do so but government programs should facilitate and create ways for them to afford to do so.

Maryanne
Maryanne

It was National Fried Chicken Day and I missed it?! Oh what a shame :( Just joking!! Teehee Dr. Bernard-Carreno, wonderful post and as always, you made me think. You made me think about how much responsibility the supermarket owners have in all of this. They are responsible for making the chips and soda aisle look so visually and financially appealing all smack in front of the entrance for adults and children to see. As a result, it's so much easier to grab a few devil dogs, a bag of salt and vinegar chips, and a bag of pirate's booty than it is to slide your way over to the fruits, thumb through the good ones, bag them up, and weigh them. What I am trying to say/ask is...since supermarket owners have control over display and prices, do they bare at least some responsibility for people deciding to choose junk food over fruits?